Firearms technology has seen numerous innovations over the years, with enhancements aimed at improving efficiency, reliability, and firing speed. One such advancement that has gained significant attention in the firearm community is the Forced Reset Trigger (AR-15). Among the most well-known products in this category is the FRT-15 Trigger, a design that has sparked both interest and controversy.

In this article, we will explore what a forced reset trigger is, how it works, its legal implications, and the role of FRT15Trigger, the company behind this innovative yet highly debated product.

---

Understanding Forced Reset Triggers (FRTs)

A forced reset trigger (FRT) is a type of firearm trigger mechanism designed to increase the rate of fire while still maintaining a semi-automatic operation. Unlike traditional semi-automatic triggers that require the shooter to manually reset the trigger between each shot, an FRT assists in the reset process, allowing for faster follow-up shots.

The key feature of an FRT is that the trigger is mechanically forced back into a reset position immediately after firing. This allows the shooter to fire successive rounds more quickly compared to a standard semi-automatic trigger. However, it is important to note that the trigger still requires a separate pull for each shot, meaning it does not turn a firearm into a fully automatic weapon.

How Does the FRT Work?

A forced reset trigger operates through a mechanical reset system that utilizes the bolt carrier group’s movement to assist in resetting the trigger. Here’s how the mechanism generally functions:

1. Firing the Round: When the shooter pulls the trigger, the hammer strikes the firing pin, igniting the round.
2. Bolt Cycling: As the bullet exits the barrel, the firearm’s bolt cycles backward due to the gas-operated system in an AR-15-style rifle.
3. Automatic Reset: Instead of requiring the shooter to manually reset the trigger, the forced reset mechanism pushes the trigger forward as the bolt cycles.
4. Ready for Next Shot: The shooter must still pull the trigger again for another round to fire, ensuring compliance with semi-automatic operation laws.

Because of this design, an experienced shooter can achieve a high rate of fire similar to that of a fully automatic weapon—but legally, it remains a semi-automatic function.

---

The FRT-15 Trigger: A Game Changer in Firearms Technology

The FRT-15 Trigger, developed by FRT15Trigger, has been one of the most popular forced reset triggers in the market. This product was designed specifically for AR-15-style rifles, offering rapid follow-up shots without requiring an external power source or modifications to the rifle’s lower receiver.

Features of the FRT-15 Trigger

• Fast Reset System: Allows shooters to achieve rapid fire without the need for additional mechanical or electronic assistance.
• Durable Construction: Built from high-quality metal components, ensuring longevity and reliability under high rates of fire.
• Drop-In Installation: Can be installed into an AR-15 platform without the need for complex modifications.
• Non-Binary Operation: Unlike binary triggers, which fire a round both when pulled and released, the FRT-15 requires a separate trigger pull for each round.

The FRT-15 Trigger became particularly popular among firearm enthusiasts, sport shooters, and those interested in self-defense applications. However, its rising popularity also drew scrutiny from regulatory agencies and anti-gun advocacy groups.

---

Legal and Regulatory Controversy Surrounding FRTs

One of the biggest issues surrounding the FRT-15 Trigger and other forced reset triggers is their legal classification. While manufacturers and firearm advocates argue that these triggers remain within the realm of semi-automatic operation, some government agencies and gun control organizations believe they function too similarly to fully automatic weapons.

ATF’s Stance on Forced Reset Triggers

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) has taken an aggressive stance against forced reset triggers. In 2022, the ATF issued warnings and seizure orders for FRTs, claiming that certain models qualify as “machine guns” under federal law.

The ATF’s argument is based on the definition of a machine gun under the National Firearms Act (NFA), which states that a firearm is considered fully automatic if it fires multiple rounds with a single trigger function. While FRTs require a separate trigger pull for each shot, the agency has argued that the mechanical reset mechanism enables a rate of fire that is too close to fully automatic weapons.

As a result, many firearm owners who purchased FRT-15 triggers faced legal uncertainty, with some receiving warnings from the ATF to surrender their triggers or risk prosecution.

Second Amendment and Legal Challenges

The crackdown on forced reset triggers has led to legal battles between gun rights organizations and federal authorities. Pro-Second Amendment groups argue that:

• The FRT-15 remains a semi-automatic device and should not be classified as a machine gun.
• The ATF is overstepping its authority by regulating an accessory without clear legislative backing.
• Restricting these triggers infringes on the rights of law-abiding gun owners who use them for sport shooting and self-defense.

On the other hand, gun control advocates claim that FRTs pose a risk to public safety due to their ability to achieve high rates of fire. The debate remains ongoing, with court cases and appeals shaping the future of forced reset triggers in the U.S.

---

The Future of FRTs and the FRT-15 Trigger

The battle over forced reset triggers, including the FRT-15 Trigger, is far from over. While legal challenges continue, there are a few potential outcomes for the future of these devices:

1. Full Ban and Seizure: If courts uphold the ATF’s classification, FRTs may be deemed illegal nationwide, forcing owners to surrender their devices.
2. Legal Regulation as NFA Items: Some policymakers have suggested that forced reset triggers could be classified under the National Firearms Act (NFA), requiring owners to register them like suppressors or short-barreled rifles.
3. Legal Victory for Gun Owners: If firearm advocates successfully challenge the ATF’s interpretation, FRTs could remain legal, setting a precedent for similar firearm innovations in the future.

Regardless of the outcome, the FRT-15 Trigger has already made a significant impact on the firearms industry, highlighting the tension between innovation, regulation, and Second Amendment rights.

---

Conclusion

The FRT-15 Trigger and other forced reset triggers represent a groundbreaking evolution in firearm technology, allowing for faster shooting without fully automatic operation. However, their legal status remains controversial, with government agencies attempting to ban or regulate them while firearm advocates fight for their right to own and use them.